1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
|
# On "local-first"
@Beyond the CRDT silver bullet
---
## Part 1
# Exposition
---
## Target
...
- documents
- files
- personal data repositories
..
Not: banking services, e-commerce, social networking, ride-sharing, etc.
---
...
# 7 ideals for local-first software
---
...
# 1 - no spinners: your work at your fingertips
---
...
# 2 - your work is not trapped on one device
---
...
# 3 - the network is optional
---
...
# 4 - seamless collaboration with your colleagues
---
...
# 5 - the long now
---
...
# 6 - security and privacy by default
---
...
# 7 - you retain ultimate ownership and control
---
## Towards a better future
....
@ CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types) as a Foundational Technology
---
## Use case
.
# in node A and node B
s = "Hello, World"
# in node A
s = "Hello, Alice"
# in node B
s = "Hello, Bob"
How to reconcile those?
- Hello, ABloibce
- Hello, AliceBob
- Hello, BobAlice
- Hello, Alice
\...
---
# Existing CRDTs differ
- performance
- storage
- compression
- metadata overhead
---
...
# Hint towards the "automerge" CRDT
---
......
@@show comparison table, page 9
---
## Part 2
# Critique
---
## Software license
...
@@"In our opinion, maintaining control and ownership of data does not mean that the software must necessarily be open source."
---
## Example 1 - intentional restriction
.
#!/bin/sh
TODAY="$(date +%s)"
LICENSE_EXPIRATION="$(date -d 2020-10-27 +%s)"
if [ "$TODAY" -ge "$LICENSE_EXPIRATION" ]; then
echo 'License expired!'
exit 1
fi
echo $((2 + 2))
.
# today
$ ./useful-adder.sh
4
# tomorrow
$ ./useful-adder.sh
License expired!
---
## Example 2 - unintentional restriction
.
# today
$ useful-program
# ... useful output ...
# tomorrow, with more data
$ useful-program
ERROR: Panic! Stack overflow!
---
..
# local-first *requires* free software
Otherwise "The Long Now" (ideal nº5) is lost
---
## Denial of existing solutions
..
@@"In principle it is possible to collaborate without a repository service, e.g. by sending patch files by email, but the majority of Git users rely on GitHub."
.
Solution: either GitHub+CRDTs or git send-email
---
## Plain-text formats
.
@@"Git is highly optimized for code and similar line-based text file"
.
It even pulls software to the plain text directtion, e.g.:
- delivery-templates
- common-core.protocols.config
.
Why not exploit that more?
---
## Ditching of web applications
..
@@"The architecture of web apps remains fundamentally server-centric
.
% FIXME: links
Disagree. Contrast PouchDB with Android Instant Apps
---
## Costs are underrated
.
- storage
- backups
- maintenance
.
Example: blog vs vlog
---
## Real-time collaboration a bit overrated
.
It is only possible on the presence of reliable, medium-quality network connection
..
@@"X also works when inside an elevator, subway or plane!"
---
## On CRDTs and developer experience
.
@@"For an app developer, how does the use of a CRDT-based data layer compare to existing storage layers like a SQL database, a filesystem, or CoreData? Is a distributed system harder to write software for?
.
@YES.
.
% FIXME: link
See "A Note on Distributed Computing"
---
## Conclusion
.
Why this is a "paper I love": it took offline-first and ran with it.
.
But a pinch of CRDT won't make the world local-first.
.
The tricky part is the end of the sentence: "in spite of the Cloud".
---
## References
.
% FIXME: links
1. "Local-First Software: You Own Your Data, in spite of the Cloud", by M. Kleppmann, A. Wiggins, P. Van Hardenberg and M. F. McGranaghan
2. The Morning Paper article
3. "A Note on Distributed Compiting", by J. Waldo, G. Wyant, A. Wollrath and S. Kendall
4. these slides: euandre.org/slide/
5. prose version of this presentation
6. view source
|
