diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES')
| -rw-r--r-- | locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-08-the-next-paradigm-shift-in-programming-video-review.po | 245 |
1 files changed, 245 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-08-the-next-paradigm-shift-in-programming-video-review.po b/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-08-the-next-paradigm-shift-in-programming-video-review.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..70ea4e6 --- /dev/null +++ b/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-08-the-next-paradigm-shift-in-programming-video-review.po @@ -0,0 +1,245 @@ +# +msgid "" +msgstr "" + +msgid "title: The Next Paradigm Shift in Programming - video review" +msgstr "" + +msgid "date: 2020-11-08" +msgstr "" + +msgid "layout: post" +msgstr "" + +msgid "lang: en" +msgstr "" + +msgid "ref: the-next-paradigm-shift-in-programming-video-review" +msgstr "" + +msgid "category: video review" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"This is a review with comments of \"[The Next Paradigm Shift in " +"Programming](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6YbK8o9rZfI)\", by Richard " +"Feldman." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"This video was *strongly* suggested to me by a colleague. I wanted to " +"discuss it with her, and when drafting my response I figured I could publish" +" it publicly instead." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Before anything else, let me just be clear: I really like the talk, and I " +"think Richard is a great public speaker. I've watched several of his talks " +"over the years, and I feel I've followed his career at a distance, with much" +" respect. This isn't a piece criticizing him personally, and I agree with " +"almost everything he said. These are just some comments but also nitpicks on" +" a few topics I think he missed, or that I view differently." +msgstr "" + +msgid "Structured programming" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"The historical overview at the beginning is very good. In fact, the very " +"video I watched previously was about structured programming!" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Kevlin Henney on \"[The Forgotten Art of Structured " +"Programming](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SFv8Wm2HdNM)\" does a deep-dive" +" on the topic of structured programming, and how on his view it is still " +"hidden in our code, when we do a `continue` or a `break` in some ways. Even " +"though it is less common to see an explicit `goto` in code these days, many " +"of the original arguments of Dijkstra against explicit `goto`s is applicable" +" to other constructs, too." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"This is a very mature view, and I like how he goes beyond the \"don't use " +"`goto`s\" heuristic and proposes and a much more nuanced understanding of " +"what \"structured programming\" means." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"In a few minutes, Richard is able to condense most of the significant bits " +"of Kevlin's talk in a didactical way. Good job." +msgstr "" + +msgid "OOP like a distributed system" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Richard extrapolates Alan Kay's original vision of OOP, and he concludes " +"that it is more like a distributed system that how people think about OOP " +"these days. But he then states that this is a rather bad idea, and we " +"shouldn't pursue it, given that distributed systems are known to be hard." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"However, his extrapolation isn't really impossible, bad or an absurd. In " +"fact, it has been followed through by Erlang. Joe Armstrong used to say that" +" \"[Erlang might the only OOP " +"language](https://www.infoq.com/interviews/johnson-armstrong-oop/)\", since " +"it actually adopted this paradigm." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"But Erlang is a functional language. So this \"OOP as a distributed system\"" +" view is more about designing systems in the large than programs in the " +"small." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"There is a switch of levels in this comparison I'm making, as can be done " +"with any language or paradigm: you can have a functional-like system that is" +" built with an OOP language (like a compiler, that given the same input will" +" produce the same output), or an OOP-like system that is built with a " +"functional language (Rich Hickey calls it \"[OOP in the " +"large](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROor6_NGIWU)\"[^the-language-of-the-" +"system])." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"So this jump from in-process paradigm to distributed paradigm is rather a " +"big one, and I don't think you he can argue that OOP has anything to say " +"about software distribution across nodes. You can still have Erlang actors " +"that run independently and send messages to each other without a network " +"between them. Any OTP application deployed on a single node effectively " +"works like that." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"I think he went a bit too far with this extrapolation. Even though I agree " +"it is a logical a fair one, it isn't evidently bad as he painted. I would be" +" fine working with a single-node OTP application and seeing someone call it " +"\"a *real* OOP program\"." +msgstr "" + +msgid "[^the-language-of-the-system]: From 24:05 to 27:45." +msgstr "" + +msgid "First class immutability" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"I agree with his view of languages moving towards the functional paradigm. " +"But I think you can narrow down the \"first-class immutability\" feature he " +"points out as present on modern functional programming languages to \"first-" +"class immutable data structures\"." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"I wouldn't categorize a language as \"supporting functional programming " +"style\" without a library for functional data structures it. By discipline " +"you can avoid side-effects, write pure functions as much as possible, and " +"pass functions as arguments around is almost every language these days, but " +"if when changing an element of a vector mutates things in-place, that is " +"still not functional programming." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"To avoid that, you end-up needing to make clones of objects to pass to a " +"function, using freezes or other workarounds. All those cases are when the " +"underlying mix of OOP and functional programming fail." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"There are some languages with third-party libraries that provide functional " +"data structures, like [immer](https://sinusoid.es/immer/) for C++, or " +"[ImmutableJS](https://immutable-js.github.io/immutable-js/) for JavaScript." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"But functional programming is more easily achievable in languages that have " +"them built-in, like Erlang, Elm and Clojure." +msgstr "" + +msgid "Managed side-effects" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"His proposal of adopting managed side-effects as a first-class language " +"concept is really intriguing." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"I haven't worked with a language with managed side-effects at scale, and I " +"don't feel this is a problem with Clojure or Erlang. But is this me finding " +"a flaw in his argument or not acknowledging a benefit unknown to me? This is" +" a provocative question I ask myself." +msgstr "" + +msgid "What about declarative programming?" +msgstr "" + +msgid "Conclusion" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Beyond all Richard said, I also hear often bring up functional programming " +"when talking about utilizing all cores of a computer, and how FP can help " +"with that." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Rich Hickey makes a great case for single-process FP on his famous talk " +"\"[Simple Made Easy](https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Simple-Made-" +"Easy/)\"." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"This is something you can achieve with a library, like " +"[Redux](https://redux.js.org/) for JavaScript or [re-" +"frame](https://github.com/Day8/re-frame) for Clojure." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Also all FP languages with managed side-effects I know are statically-typed," +" and all dynamically-typed FP languages I know don't have managed side-" +"effects baked in." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"In \"[Out of the Tar " +"Pit](http://curtclifton.net/papers/MoseleyMarks06a.pdf)\", B. Moseley and P." +" Marks go beyond his view of functional programming as the basis, and name a" +" possible \"functional relational programming\" as an even better solution. " +"They explicitly call out some flaws in most of the modern functional " +"programming languages, and instead pick declarative programming as an even " +"better starting paradigm." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"If the next paradigm shift is towards functional programming, will the " +"following shift be towards declarative programming?" +msgstr "" + +#~ msgid "" +#~ "This is something you can achieve with a library, like " +#~ "[Redux](https://redux.js.org/) for JavaScript or re-frame for Clojure." +#~ msgstr "" + +#~ msgid "" +#~ "Also all languages with managed side-effects I know are statically-typed, " +#~ "and all dynamically-typed languages I know don't have managed side-effects " +#~ "baked in." +#~ msgstr "" + +#~ msgid "" +#~ "\"[Out of the Tar Pit](http://curtclifton.net/papers/MoseleyMarks06a.pdf)\" " +#~ "by B. Moseley and P. Marks goes beyond his view of functional programming, " +#~ "and name a possible \"functional relational programming\" as an even better " +#~ "solution. They explicitly call out some flaws in most of the modern " +#~ "functional programming languages, and instead pick declarative programming " +#~ "as an even better starting paradigm." +#~ msgstr "" + +#~ msgid "" +#~ "If functional programming is the next paradigm shift, is declarative " +#~ "programming the next next paradigm shift?" +#~ msgstr "" |