summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/content/slides/2020-11-14-on-local-first-beyond-the-crdt-silver-bullet.slides
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorEuAndreh <eu@euandre.org>2025-04-01 06:09:08 -0300
committerEuAndreh <eu@euandre.org>2025-04-02 08:05:48 -0300
commitd5795ea791bd49a8ef30f1c00c811f3f4975770e (patch)
treeee8781f5231c0d66802322e5857e1690f7b2dacb /src/content/slides/2020-11-14-on-local-first-beyond-the-crdt-silver-bullet.slides
parentsrc/content/style.css: Add adjustment for asciidoc (diff)
downloadeuandre.org-d5795ea791bd49a8ef30f1c00c811f3f4975770e.tar.gz
euandre.org-d5795ea791bd49a8ef30f1c00c811f3f4975770e.tar.xz
src/content/: Tweak asciidoc leftovers
Diffstat (limited to 'src/content/slides/2020-11-14-on-local-first-beyond-the-crdt-silver-bullet.slides')
-rw-r--r--src/content/slides/2020-11-14-on-local-first-beyond-the-crdt-silver-bullet.slides4
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/src/content/slides/2020-11-14-on-local-first-beyond-the-crdt-silver-bullet.slides b/src/content/slides/2020-11-14-on-local-first-beyond-the-crdt-silver-bullet.slides
index 33fc239..8f17982 100644
--- a/src/content/slides/2020-11-14-on-local-first-beyond-the-crdt-silver-bullet.slides
+++ b/src/content/slides/2020-11-14-on-local-first-beyond-the-crdt-silver-bullet.slides
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ Why not exploit that more?
> The architecture of web apps remains fundamentally server-centric
-Disagree. Contrast [PouchDB][pouchdb] with Android [Instant Apps][instant-apps]
+Disagree. Contrast [PouchDB][pouchdb] with Android [Instant Apps][instant-apps]
[pouchdb]: https://pouchdb.com/
[instant-apps]: https://developer.android.com/topic/google-play-instant
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ connection
### On CRDTs and developer experience
> For an app developer, how does the use of a CRDT-based data layer compare to
-> existing storage layers like a SQL database, a filesystem, or CoreData? Is a
+> existing storage layers like a SQL database, a filesystem, or CoreData? Is a
> distributed system harder to write software for?
Yes.