git mv locale/ po/

1 files changed, 210 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/po/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.po b/po/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.po
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6aa66a8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/po/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.po
@@ -0,0 +1,210 @@
+#
+msgid ""
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"title: Common Lisp argument precedence order parameterization of a generic "
+"function"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "layout: post"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "lang: en"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"ref: common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-"
+"function"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"When CLOS dispatches a method, it picks the most specific method definition "
+"to the argument list:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"\n"
+"* (defgeneric a-fn (x))\n"
+"#<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION A-FN (0) {5815ACB9}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod a-fn (x) :default-method)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD A-FN (T) {581DB535}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod a-fn ((x number)) :a-number)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD A-FN (NUMBER) {58241645}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod a-fn ((x (eql 1))) :number-1)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD A-FN ((EQL 1)) {582A7D75}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (a-fn nil)\n"
+":DEFAULT-METHOD\n"
+"\n"
+"* (a-fn \"1\")\n"
+":DEFAULT-METHOD\n"
+"\n"
+"* (a-fn 0)\n"
+":A-NUMBER\n"
+"\n"
+"* (a-fn 1)\n"
+":NUMBER-1\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"CLOS uses a similar logic when choosing the method from parent classes, when"
+" multiple ones are available:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"* (defclass class-a () ())\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS-A {583E0B25}>\n"
+"* (defclass class-b () ())\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS-B {583E7F6D}>\n"
+"* (defgeneric another-fn (obj))\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION ANOTHER-FN (0) {583DA749}>\n"
+"* (defmethod another-fn ((obj class-a)) :class-a)\n"
+"; Compiling LAMBDA (.PV-CELL. .NEXT-METHOD-CALL. OBJ):\n"
+"; Compiling Top-Level Form:\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD ANOTHER-FN (CLASS-A) {584523C5}>\n"
+"* (defmethod another-fn ((obj class-b)) :class-b)\n"
+"; Compiling LAMBDA (.PV-CELL. .NEXT-METHOD-CALL. OBJ):\n"
+"; Compiling Top-Level Form:\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD ANOTHER-FN (CLASS-B) {584B8895}>\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Given the above definitions, when inheriting from `class-a` and `class-b`, "
+"the order of inheritance matters:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"* (defclass class-a-coming-first (class-a class-b) ())\n"
+"#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS-A-COMING-FIRST {584BE6AD}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defclass class-b-coming-first (class-b class-a) ())\n"
+"#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS-B-COMING-FIRST {584C744D}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (another-fn (make-instance 'class-a-coming-first))\n"
+":CLASS-A\n"
+"\n"
+"* (another-fn (make-instance 'class-b-coming-first))\n"
+":CLASS-B\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Combining the order of inheritance with generic functions with multiple "
+"arguments, CLOS has to make a choice of how to pick a method given two "
+"competing definitions, and its default strategy is prioritizing from left to"
+" right:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"* (defgeneric yet-another-fn (obj1 obj2))\n"
+"#<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION YET-ANOTHER-FN (0) {584D9EC9}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod yet-another-fn ((obj1 class-a) obj2) :first-arg-specialized)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD YET-ANOTHER-FN (CLASS-A T) {5854269D}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod yet-another-fn (obj1 (obj2 class-b)) :second-arg-specialized)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD YET-ANOTHER-FN (T CLASS-B) {585AAAAD}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (yet-another-fn (make-instance 'class-a) (make-instance 'class-b))\n"
+":FIRST-ARG-SPECIALIZED\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"For that, we use the `:argument-precedence-order` option when declaring a "
+"generic function:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"* (defgeneric yet-another-fn (obj1 obj2) (:argument-precedence-order obj2 obj1))\n"
+"#<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION YET-ANOTHER-FN (2) {584D9EC9}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (yet-another-fn (make-instance 'class-a) (make-instance 'class-b))\n"
+":SECOND-ARG-SPECIALIZED\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"I liked that the `:argument-precedence-order` option exists. We shouldn't "
+"have to change the arguments from `(obj1 obj2)` to `(obj2 obj1)` just to "
+"make CLOS pick the method that we want. We can configure its default "
+"behaviour if desired, and keep the order of arguments however it best fits "
+"the generic function."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "Comparison with Clojure"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "Clojure has an equivalent, when using `defmulti`."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Since when declaring a multi-method with `defmulti` we must define the "
+"dispatch function, Clojure uses it to pick the method definition. Since the "
+"dispatch function is required, there is no need for a default behaviour, "
+"such as left-to-right."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "Conclusion"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Making the argument precedence order configurable for generic functions but "
+"not for class definitions makes a lot of sense."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"One shouldn't change the order of arguments of a generic function for the "
+"sake of tailoring it to the CLOS priority ranking algorithm, but doing it "
+"for a class definition is just fine."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "TIL."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"CLOS has to make a choice between the first and the second definition of "
+"`yet-another-fn`, but its choice is just a heuristic. What if we want the "
+"choice to be based on the second argument, instead of the first?"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"When declaring a class, we can choose the precedence order, and that is "
+"about it. But when defining a generic function, the order of arguments is "
+"more important to the function semantics, and the argument precedence being "
+"left-to-right is just the default behaviour."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "References"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"[Object-Oriented Programming in Common Lisp: A Programmer's Guide to "
+"CLOS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-"
+"Oriented_Programming_in_Common_Lisp), by Sonja E. Keene"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "date: 2021-04-24 2"
+msgstr ""
+
+#~ msgid "date: 2021-04-24"
+#~ msgstr ""
+
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "CLOS has to make a choice between the first and the second definition of "
+#~ "`yet-another-fn`, but its choice is just a heuristic. What if we want to the"
+#~ " choice to be based on the second argument first?"
+#~ msgstr ""
+
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "When declaring a class, we can choose the precedence order, and that is "
+#~ "about it. But when defining a generic function, the order of argumentws is "
+#~ "more important to the function semantics, and the argument precedence being "
+#~ "left-to-right is just the default behaviour."
+#~ msgstr ""