s/libre/free/

1 files changed, 34 insertions, 17 deletions

diff --git a/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po b/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po
index 57ea9cb..03ca2c6 100644
--- a/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po
+++ b/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po
@@ -130,23 +130,6 @@ msgid ""
 msgstr ""
 
 msgid ""
-"The point is: if the software isn't free/libre, \"The Long Now\" isn't "
-"achievable without a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe the authors were trying "
-"to be more friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in "
-"doing so they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" "
-"with proprietary software."
-msgstr ""
-
-msgid ""
-"It isn't the same as saying that any free/libre software achieves that "
-"ideal, either. The license can still be free, but the source code can become"
-" unavailable due to cloud rot. Or maybe the build is undocumented, or the "
-"build tools had specific configuration that one has to guess. A piece of "
-"free/libre software can still fail to achieve \"The Long Now\". Being free "
-"doesn't guarantee it, just makes it possible."
-msgstr ""
-
-msgid ""
 "An open specification could serve as a blueprint to other implementations, "
 "making the data format more friendly to reverse-engineering. But the re-"
 "implementation still has to exist, at which point the original software "
@@ -443,6 +426,40 @@ msgid ""
 " more being done on the \"local-first\" space."
 msgstr ""
 
+msgid ""
+"The point is: if the software isn't free, \"The Long Now\" isn't achievable "
+"without a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe the authors were trying to be more "
+"friendly towards business who don't like free software, but in doing so "
+"they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" with "
+"proprietary software."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"It isn't the same as saying that any free software achieves that ideal, "
+"either. The license can still be free, but the source code can become "
+"unavailable due to cloud rot. Or maybe the build is undocumented, or the "
+"build tools had specific configuration that one has to guess. A piece of "
+"free software can still fail to achieve \"The Long Now\". Being free doesn't"
+" guarantee it, just makes it possible."
+msgstr ""
+
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "The point is: if the software isn't free/libre, \"The Long Now\" isn't "
+#~ "achievable without a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe the authors were trying "
+#~ "to be more friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in "
+#~ "doing so they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" "
+#~ "with proprietary software."
+#~ msgstr ""
+
+#~ msgid ""
+#~ "It isn't the same as saying that any free/libre software achieves that "
+#~ "ideal, either. The license can still be free, but the source code can become"
+#~ " unavailable due to cloud rot. Or maybe the build is undocumented, or the "
+#~ "build tools had specific configuration that one has to guess. A piece of "
+#~ "free/libre software can still fail to achieve \"The Long Now\". Being free "
+#~ "doesn't guarantee it, just makes it possible."
+#~ msgstr ""
+
 #~ msgid "They give examples of artificial restrictions, like this one:"
 #~ msgstr ""