From 570ec471d1605318aeefb030cd78682ae442235b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: EuAndreh <eu@euandre.org>
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2025 21:51:40 -0300
Subject: src/content/: Update all files left to asciidoc

---
 .../tils/2020/11/12/git-bisect-automation.adoc     | 23 +++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/content/tils/2020/11/12/git-bisect-automation.adoc')

diff --git a/src/content/tils/2020/11/12/git-bisect-automation.adoc b/src/content/tils/2020/11/12/git-bisect-automation.adoc
index 9c34b2a..c70bb2d 100644
--- a/src/content/tils/2020/11/12/git-bisect-automation.adoc
+++ b/src/content/tils/2020/11/12/git-bisect-automation.adoc
@@ -1,18 +1,4 @@
----
-
-title: Git bisect automation
-
-date: 2020-11-12 2
-
-layout: post
-
-lang: en
-
-ref: git-bisect-automation
-
-eu_categories: git
-
----
+= Git bisect automation
 
 It is good to have an standardized way to run builds and tests on the repository
 of a project, so that you can find when a bug was introduced by using
@@ -22,14 +8,15 @@ I've already been in the situation when a bug was introduced and I didn't know
 how it even was occurring, and running Git bisect over hundreds of commits to
 pinpoint the failing commit was very empowering:
 
-```
+....
 $ GOOD_COMMIT_SHA=e1fd0a817d192c5a5df72dd7422e36558fa78e46
 $ git bisect start HEAD $GOOD_COMMIT_SHA
 $ git bisect run sn -c './build.sh && ./run-failing-case.sh'
-```
+....
 
 Git will than do a binary search between the commits, and run the commands you
 provide it with to find the failing commit.
 
 Instead of being afraid of doing a bisect, you should instead leverage it, and
-make Git help you dig through the history of the repository to find the bad code.
+make Git help you dig through the history of the repository to find the bad
+code.
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

