From d5795ea791bd49a8ef30f1c00c811f3f4975770e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: EuAndreh <eu@euandre.org>
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 06:09:08 -0300
Subject: src/content/: Tweak asciidoc leftovers

---
 src/content/blog/2020/11/14/local-first-review.adoc | 14 +++++++-------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

(limited to 'src/content/blog/2020/11/14/local-first-review.adoc')

diff --git a/src/content/blog/2020/11/14/local-first-review.adoc b/src/content/blog/2020/11/14/local-first-review.adoc
index 0dd3bea..420c886 100644
--- a/src/content/blog/2020/11/14/local-first-review.adoc
+++ b/src/content/blog/2020/11/14/local-first-review.adoc
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-= Local-First Software: You Own Your Data, in spite of the Cloud - article review
+= Local-First Software: article review
 
 :empty:
 :presentation: link:../../../../slides/2020/11/14/local-first.html
@@ -78,8 +78,8 @@ license expiration allowed.  Sure you could change the clock on the computer,
 but there are many other ways that this type of intentional restriction is in
 conflict with that ideal.
 
-However, what about unintentional restrictions? What if a software had an equal
-or similar restriction, and stopped working after days pass? Or what if the
+However, what about unintentional restrictions?  What if a software had an equal
+or similar restriction, and stopped working after days pass?  Or what if the
 programmer added a constant to make the development simpler, and this led to
 unintentionally restricting the user?
 
@@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ local-first solutions that already exist.
 
 Say the automerge CRDT proves to be even more useful than what everybody
 imagined.  Say someone builds a local-first repository service using it.  How
-will it change anything of the Git/GitHub model? What is different about it that
-prevents people in the future writing a paper saying:
+will it change anything of the Git/GitHub model?  What is different about it
+that prevents people in the future writing a paper saying:
 
 ____
 In principle it is possible to collaborate without a repository service, e.g. by
@@ -197,8 +197,8 @@ Well, I disagree.
 
 The problem isn't inherit to the web platform, but instead how people use it.
 
-I have myself built offline-first applications, leveraging IndexedDB, App Cache, _etc_.  I wanted to build an offline-first application on the web, and so I
-did.
+I have myself built offline-first applications, leveraging IndexedDB, App Cache,
+_etc_.  I wanted to build an offline-first application on the web, and so I did.
 
 In fact, many people choose {pouchdb}[PouchDB] _because_ of that, since it is a
 good tool for offline-first web applications.  The problem isn't really the
-- 
cgit v1.2.3

