From 75423d429d637a311748adff0599136c70522f12 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: EuAndreh Date: Sat, 24 Apr 2021 18:28:27 -0300 Subject: Add references section to TIL on CLOS --- _tils/2020-08-14-browse-a-git-repository-at-a-specific-commit.md | 2 +- ...rgument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.md | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to '_tils') diff --git a/_tils/2020-08-14-browse-a-git-repository-at-a-specific-commit.md b/_tils/2020-08-14-browse-a-git-repository-at-a-specific-commit.md index 7965d29..d06f0c1 100644 --- a/_tils/2020-08-14-browse-a-git-repository-at-a-specific-commit.md +++ b/_tils/2020-08-14-browse-a-git-repository-at-a-specific-commit.md @@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ After any of those checkouts, you have to `git reset .` to reset your current staging area back to what it was before the checkout. -## References: +## References 1. [GIT: Checkout to a specific folder][0] (StackOverflow) diff --git a/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.md b/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.md index eb19b38..cce0e42 100644 --- a/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.md +++ b/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.md @@ -131,3 +131,7 @@ But when defining a generic function, the order of arguments is more important t One shouldn't change the order of arguments of a generic function for the sake of tailoring it to the CLOS priority ranking algorithm, but doing it for a class definition is just fine. TIL. + +## References + +1. [Object-Oriented Programming in Common Lisp: A Programmer's Guide to CLOS](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Object-Oriented_Programming_in_Common_Lisp), by Sonja E. Keene -- cgit v1.2.3