From d697cd5e94cb2edc711dedd8aab0f0c1518032c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: EuAndreh Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 08:57:23 -0300 Subject: s/FOOS/libre software/g --- ...t-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to '_articles') diff --git a/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md b/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md index 1a41c0c..635a9a5 100644 --- a/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md +++ b/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md @@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ rather a "Long Now as long as the software keeps working as expected". The point is: if the software isn't free/libre, "The Long Now" isn't achievable without a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe the authors were trying to be more -friendly towards business who don't like FOSS, but in doing so they've proposed +friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in doing so they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling "The Long Now" with proprietary software. It isn't the same as saying that any free/libre software achieves that ideal, -- cgit v1.2.3