summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/content/en
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'src/content/en')
-rw-r--r--src/content/en/slide/2020/10/19/feature-flags.adoc371
-rw-r--r--src/content/en/slide/2020/11/14/local-first-hype.adoc306
2 files changed, 265 insertions, 412 deletions
diff --git a/src/content/en/slide/2020/10/19/feature-flags.adoc b/src/content/en/slide/2020/10/19/feature-flags.adoc
index 3a97621..553cf4c 100644
--- a/src/content/en/slide/2020/10/19/feature-flags.adoc
+++ b/src/content/en/slide/2020/10/19/feature-flags.adoc
@@ -1,329 +1,230 @@
-= Rollout, feature flag, experiment, operational toggle
-
-# Rollout, feature flag, experiment, operational toggle
-Different use cases for **backend**, **frontend** and **mobile**
-
---
+# Rollout, feature flag, experiment, operational toggle
-"Feature flags" tend to come up when talking about **continuous deployment**
-
-???
-
-I'm using "quotes" because I'm mixing up different meanings of "rollout"
+@Different use cases for backend, frontend and mobile
---
-
-# CI
-continuous integration
-
-# CD
-continuous delivery
-
-# CD
-**continuous deployment**
-
-???
-
-Background: build vocabulary, why are feature flags related to CD
-
-CI solves: manual integration of long-lived branches
-
-CD solves: automation of deployment process
-
-CD solves: releases as frequent as possible
-
-That's where the "GoCD" name comes from
+.
+.
+.
+# "Feature flags" tend to come up when talking about continuous deployment
---
+.
+.
+.
+.
+@CI: continuous integration
+.
+@CD: continuous delivery
+.
+@CD: continuous deployment
-# Types:
+---
+## Types
+.
+.
+.
1. rollout
2. feature flag
3. experiment
4. operational toggle
+% {favicon.svg}
---
+## Rollout
-# rollout
-## For *rolling out* a new version of software
-
-**Short-lived** using **percentages**
-
-- a [new deployment of k8s][k8s]
-- new [APK released to the Play Store][apk]
+# For *rolling out* a new version of software
-[k8s]: https://kubernetes.io/docs/concepts/workloads/controllers/deployment/#creating-a-deployment
-[apk]: https://support.google.com/googleplay/android-developer/answer/6346149?hl=en
+Short-lived using percentages
-???
-
-Relevant as long as the new code is deployed
+% FIXME: links
+- a new deployment of kubernetes
+- new APK released to the Play Store
---
+## Feature flag
-# feature flag
-## For turning a feature *on* or *off*
-
-**Medium-lived** using **allow list**, **A/B test**, **percentage**,
-**app version**, *etc*.
-
-- `:new-chargeback-flow`
-- `:new-debit-card-activation-screen`
+# For turning a feature *on* or *off*
-???
+Medium-lived using allow list, A/B test, percentage, app version, etc.
-Relevant as long as the new code is being developed
+- :new-chargeback-flow
+- :new-debit-card-activation-screen
---
+## Experiment
-# experiment
-## For analyzing behaviour
+# For analysing behaviour
-**Medium-lived** using **allow list** and **A/B test**
+Medium-lived using allow list and A/B test
-- `:debit-withdrawal-test`
+- :debit-withdrawal-test
---
+## Operational toggle
-# operational toggle
-## For disabling features in `#crash`-like situations
-
-**Long-lived** using **percentage**
-
-- `:bank-barcode-payment`
-- `:savings-bank-barcode-query-provider`
+# For disabling features in #crash-like situations
-???
+Long-lived using percentage
-Lives for as long as the code is in production.
-
-It feels like a system-level circuit breaker.
+- :bank-barcode-payment
+- :savings-bank-barcode-query-provider
---
-
-We now know about the types
-
-## But they have different relevance for **backend**, **frontend** and **mobile**
+.
+.
+@We know know about the types
+# But they have different relevance for backend, frontend and mobile
---
-
-# backend
-
-1. **rollout**: k8s blue/green, canary and ~`common-rollout`~ `common-xp`
-2. **feature flag**: ~`common-rollout`~ `common-xp` and datasets
-3. **experiment**: `common-xp`
-4. **operational toggle**: ~`common-rollout`~ `common-xp`
-
-???
-
-This is a bit why common-rollout isn't called *common-feature-flag*: it was
-initially designed with backend usage of mostly *rollouts* in mind, and just a
-bit *feature flags*.
-
-Avoid using configuration for doing operational toggles: it is less dynamic, so
-it defeats the purpose.
+## backend
+.
+.
+1. rollout: k8s blue/green, canary and ~common-rollout~ common-xp
+2. feature flag: ~common-rollout~ common-xp and datasets
+3. experiment: common-xp
+4. operational toggle: ~common-rollout~ common-xp
---
-
-# frontend
-
-1. **rollout**: CDN and page refreshes
-2. **feature flag**: percentages and maybe IPs (no `:customer/id` on the website)
-3. **experiment**: via dynamic backend control
-4. **operational toggle**: via dynamic backend control
+## frontend
+.
+.
+1. rollout: CDN and page refreshes
+2. feature flag: percentages and maybe IPs (no :customer/id on the website)
+3. experiment: via dynamic backend control
+4. operational toggle: via dynamic backend control
---
-
-# mobile
-
-1. **rollout**: app stores
-2. **feature flag**: via dynamic backend control
-3. **experiment**: via dynamic backend control
-4. **operational toggle**: via dynamic backend control
+## backend
+.
+.
+1. rollout: app stores
+2. feature flag: via dynamic backend control
+3. experiment: via dynamic backend control
+4. operational toggle: via dynamic backend control
---
-
-Key differentiator is
-## How much **control** we have over the **environment**
+.
+.
+@Key differentiator is
+# how much *control* we have over the environment
---
-
-## **backend**
-
-# Full control
-πŸŽ‰
-
-???
-
-Can edit, update and even delete rollouts as desired.
-
-Mix and match at will!
+## backend
+# full control
+% FIXME: emoji
+% πŸŽ‰
---
-
-## **frontend**
-
-# Partial control
-
-When choose when to make a new version available
-
-???
-
-We can control when a new version is available, partially when someone will
-upgrade it.
-
-But it is easy to fallback to "reload the page and try again".
+## frontend
+# partial control
+We choose when to make a new version available
---
-
-## **mobile**
-
-# Very limited control
-
+## mobile
+# very limited control
- app stores can restrict updates (worse for iOS)
-- customers still have to download new versions
+- customers still have to download new versions
---
-
# Costs
-
- more complex code
- compatibility with old app versions
- nesting is exponential
---
-
# Benefits
-
- dynamicity
---
-
-## Weighting costs Γ— benefits
-
-The less control we have, the more we value dynamicity
+## weighting costs Γ— benefits
+# The less control we have, the more we value dynamicity
---
-
-## Weighting costs Γ— benefits
-
+## weighting costs Γ— benefits
+.
+.
+.
- backend: sometimes worth the cost
-- frontend: almost always worth cost
-- mobile: **always** worth cost
+- frontend: almost always worth the cost
+- mobile: *always* worth the cost
---
-
+.
+.
+.
# Best practices
---
-
-## Dynamic content > feature flag
-
-Always true for **mobile**, almost always for **frontend**
+# dynamic content > feature flag
+Always true for mobile, almost always for frontend
---
+# Use :include-list for named groups
+Always true for backend, frontend and mobile
-## Use `:include-list` for named groups
-
-Always true for **backend**, **frontend** and **mobile**
-
-{% raw %}
-```clojure [2-3]
-{:rules
- #{{:type :include-list
- :content {:filename "debit-team-members.txt"}}}}
-```
-{% endraw %}
+ {:rules
+ #{{:types :include-list
+ :content {:filename "debit-team-members.txt"}}}}
---
+# Always use :app-version
+Only for mobile
-## Always use `:app-version`
-
-only for **mobile**
-
-{% raw %}
-```clojure [2]
-{:rules
- #{{:type :app-version
- :content {:min-version #{{:platform :android
- :code 1000000}
- {:platform :ios
- :code 2000000}}}}}}
-```
-{% endraw %}
+ {:rules
+ #{{:types :app-version
+ :content {:min-version #{{:platform :android
+ :code 1000000}
+ {:platform :ios
+ :code 2000000}}}}}}
---
+# Extend ~common-rollout~ common-xp if required
-## Extend ~`common-rollout`~ `common-xp` if required
-
-That's how `:include-list`, `:app-version`, *etc.* were born
+That's how :include-list, :app-version, etc. were born
---
-
-## Beware of many nested feature flags
-
-True for **backend**, **frontend** and **mobile**
-
-???
-
-Exponential growth of combinations
+# Beware of many nested feature flags
+True for backend, frontend and mobile
---
-
-## Don't delete app-facing feature flags
-
-True for **mobile**
-
-???
-
-This could break old app versions, only do this intentionally
-
-We don't have (yet) a strategy for dealing with LTS of the app, and we just say:
-"we'll support every app version out there".
+# Don't delete app-facing feature flags
+True for mobile
---
-
-## Include a feature flag on the whiteboarding phase
+.
+.
+.
+# Include a feature flag on the whiteboarding phase
---
-
-## Include deleting/retiring the feature flag at the end
+.
+.
+.
+# Include deleting/retiring the feature flag at the end
---
-
-## Avoid renaming a feature flag
-
-Use `:app-version` with `:min-version` instead
+# Avoid renaming a feature flag
+Use :app-version with :min-version instead
---
-
+.
+.
+.
# And most importantly...
---
-
-# ***Always*** rely on a feature flag on the app
-
-Never do a hot fix, avoid expedited releases at all costs
-
-???
-
-The app is where we have less control, so the feature flag is how we get some of
-that control back.
-
-This doesn't mean you'll need 1 feature flag per PR
-
-There's not such thing as:
-"This is such a small thing, it doesn't need a feature flag"
-
-You should ask yourself:
-"It this crashes the app, am I OK with waiting for the next release train?"
+# *Always* rely on a feature flag on the app
+Never do a hotfix, avoid expedited releases at all costs
---
-
-## Thank you!
-
-References:
-
-1. "[Feature Toggles (aka Feature Flags)](https://martinfowler.com/articles/feature-toggles.html)", by Pete Hodgson
-1. "[Continuous integration vs. continuous delivery vs. continuous deployment](https://www.atlassian.com/continuous-delivery/principles/continuous-integration-vs-delivery-vs-deployment)", by Sten Pittet
-1. [Accelerate](https://itrevolution.com/book/accelerate/), by N. Forsgren, J. Humble and G. Kim
+## References
+.
+% FIXME: links
+1. "Feature Toggles (aka Feature Flags)", by Pete Hodgson
+2. "Continuous integration vs. delivery vs. deployment", by Sten Pittet
+3. Accelerate, by N. Forsgren, J. Humble and G. Kim
+4. these slides: euandre.org/slide/
+5. prose version of this presentation
+6. view source
diff --git a/src/content/en/slide/2020/11/14/local-first-hype.adoc b/src/content/en/slide/2020/11/14/local-first-hype.adoc
index bb27074..fd83115 100644
--- a/src/content/en/slide/2020/11/14/local-first-hype.adoc
+++ b/src/content/en/slide/2020/11/14/local-first-hype.adoc
@@ -1,252 +1,204 @@
-= On "local-first": beyond the CRDT silver bullet
+# On "local-first"
-# On local-first
-
-Beyond the CRDT silver bullet
-
----
-
-# Part 1
-
-Exposition
+@Beyond the CRDT silver bullet
---
-
-## "cloud apps" vs "old-fashioned apps"
+## Part 1
+# Exposition
---
-
## Target
-
+...
- documents
- files
- personal data repositories
-
-Not: banking services, e-commerce, social networking, ride-sharing, *etc*.
+..
+Not: banking services, e-commerce, social networking, ride-sharing, etc.
---
-
-## 7 Ideals for local-first software
+...
+# 7 ideals for local-first software
---
-
-### 1 - No Spinners: Your Work at Your Fingertips
+...
+# 1 - no spinners: your work at your fingertips
---
-
-### 2 - Your Work Is Not Trapped on One Device
+...
+# 2 - your work is not trapped on one device
---
-
-### 3 - The Network Is Optional
+...
+# 3 - the network is optional
---
-
-### 4 - Seamless Collaboration with Your Colleagues
+...
+# 4 - seamless collaboration with your colleagues
---
-
-### 5 - The Long Now
+...
+# 5 - the long now
---
-
-### 6 - Security and Privacy by Default
+...
+# 6 - security and privacy by default
---
-
-### 7 - You Retain Ultimate Ownership and Control
+...
+# 7 - you retain ultimate ownership and control
---
-
-## Towards a Better Future
-
-CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types) as a Foundational Technology
+## Towards a better future
+....
+@ CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types) as a Foundational Technology
---
-
-### Use case
-
-```
-# in node A and node B
-s = "Hello, World"
-
-# in node A
-s = "Hello, Alice"
-
-# in node B
-s = "Hello, Bob"
-```
+## Use case
+.
+ # in node A and node B
+ s = "Hello, World"
+
+ # in node A
+ s = "Hello, Alice"
+
+ # in node B
+ s = "Hello, Bob"
How to reconcile those?
-- `Hello, ABloibce`
-- `Hello, AliceBob`
-- `Hello, BobAlice`
-- `Hello, Alice`
-- `Hello, Bob`
+- Hello, ABloibce
+- Hello, AliceBob
+- Hello, BobAlice
+- Hello, Alice
+\...
---
-
-Existing CRDTs differ:
+# Existing CRDTs differ
- performance
- storage
- compression
- metadata overhead
---
-
-Hint towards the "automerge" CRDT
+...
+# Hint towards the "automerge" CRDT
---
-
-*show comparison table, page 9*
+......
+@@show comparison table, page 9
---
-
-# Part 2
-
-Critique
+## Part 2
+# Critique
---
-
-### Software license
-
-> In our opinion, maintaining control and ownership of data does not mean that
-> the software must necessarily be open source.
+## Software license
+...
+@@"In our opinion, maintaining control and ownership of data does not mean that the software must necessarily be open source."
---
+## Example 1 - intentional restriction
+.
+ #!/bin/sh
+ TODAY="$(date +%s)"
+ LICENSE_EXPIRATION="$(date -d 2020-10-27 +%s)"
+ if [ "$TODAY" -ge "$LICENSE_EXPIRATION" ]; then
+ echo 'License expired!'
+ exit 1
+ fi
+ echo $((2 + 2))
+.
+ # today
+ $ ./useful-adder.sh
+ 4
-#### Example 1 - intentional restriction
-
-```bash
-#!/bin/sh
-
-TODAY=$(date +%s)
-LICENSE_EXPIRATION=$(date -d 2020-10-27 +%s)
-
-if [ $TODAY -ge $LICENSE_EXPIRATION ]; then
- echo 'License expired!'
- exit 1
-fi
-
-echo $((2 + 2))
-```
-
-```bash
-# today
-$ ./useful-adder.sh
-4
-# tomorrow
-$ ./useful-adder.sh
-License expired!
-```
-
+ # tomorrow
+ $ ./useful-adder.sh
+ License expired!
---
+## Example 2 - unintentional restriction
+.
+ # today
+ $ useful-program
+ # ... useful output ...
+
+ # tomorrow, with more data
+ $ useful-program
+ ERROR: Panic! Stack overflow!
-#### Example 2 - unintentional restriction
-
-```bash
-# today
-$ useful-program
-# ...useful output...
-
-# tomorrow, with more data
-$ useful-program
-ERROR: Panic! Stack overflow!
-```
---
-
-### local-first **requires** free software
+..
+# local-first *requires* free software
Otherwise "The Long Now" (ideal nΒΊ5) is lost
---
-
-### Denial of existing solutions
-
-> In principle it is possible to collaborate without a repository service,
-> e.g. by sending patch files by email, but the majority of Git users rely
-> on GitHub.
-
-Solution: either GitHub+CRDTs or `git` **`send-email`**
+## Denial of existing solutions
+..
+@@"In principle it is possible to collaborate without a repository service, e.g. by sending patch files by email, but the majority of Git users rely on GitHub."
+.
+Solution: either GitHub+CRDTs or git send-email
---
-
-### Plain text formats
-
-> Git is highly optimized for code and similar line-based text file
-
-It even pulls software to the plain text direction, e.g.:
+## Plain-text formats
+.
+@@"Git is highly optimized for code and similar line-based text file"
+.
+It even pulls software to the plain text directtion, e.g.:
- delivery-templates
-- `common-core.protocols.config`
-
+- common-core.protocols.config
+.
Why not exploit that more?
---
-
-### Ditching of web applications
-
-> The architecture of web apps remains fundamentally server-centric
-
-Disagree. Contrast [PouchDB][pouchdb] with Android [Instant Apps][instant-apps]
-
-[pouchdb]: https://pouchdb.com/
-[instant-apps]: https://developer.android.com/topic/google-play-instant
-
-???
-
-Talk on dynamic content
+## Ditching of web applications
+..
+@@"The architecture of web apps remains fundamentally server-centric
+.
+% FIXME: links
+Disagree. Contrast PouchDB with Android Instant Apps
---
-
-### Costs are underrated
-
+## Costs are underrated
+.
- storage
- backups
- maintenance
-
+.
Example: blog vs vlog
---
-
-### Real-time collaboration a bit overrated
-
-It is only possible on the presence of reliable, medium-quality network
-connection
-
-> X also works when inside an elevator, subway or plane!
-
-<!-- πŸ€¦β€ -->
+## Real-time collaboration a bit overrated
+.
+It is only possible on the presence of reliable, medium-quality network connection
+..
+@@"X also works when inside an elevator, subway or plane!"
---
-
-### On CRDTs and developer experience
-
-> For an app developer, how does the use of a CRDT-based data layer compare to
-> existing storage layers like a SQL database, a filesystem, or CoreData? Is a
-> distributed system harder to write software for?
-
-Yes.
-
-See "[A Note on Distributed Computing][note-dist-comp]"
-
-[note-dist-comp]: https://web.archive.org/web/20130116163535/http://labs.oracle.com/techrep/1994/smli_tr-94-29.pdf
+## On CRDTs and developer experience
+.
+@@"For an app developer, how does the use of a CRDT-based data layer compare to existing storage layers like a SQL database, a filesystem, or CoreData? Is a distributed system harder to write software for?
+.
+@YES.
+.
+% FIXME: link
+See "A Note on Distributed Computing"
---
-
## Conclusion
-
+.
Why this is a "paper I love": it took offline-first and ran with it.
-
-But a pinch of CRDT won't make the world local-first.
-
-The tricky part is the end of the sentence: "**in spite of the Cloud**".
-
----
-
-## Thank you!
-
-References:
-
-1. "[Local-First Software: You Own Your Data, in spite of the Cloud](https://martin.kleppmann.com/papers/local-first.pdf)", by M. Kleppmann, A. Wiggins, P. Van Hardenberg and M. F. McGranaghan
-1. [The Morning Paper](https://blog.acolyer.org/2019/11/20/local-first-software/) article
-1. "[A Note on Distributed Computing](https://web.archive.org/web/20130116163535/http://labs.oracle.com/techrep/1994/smli_tr-94-29.pdf)", by J. Waldo, G. Wyant, A. Wollrath and S Kendall
+.
+But a pinch of CRDT won't make the world local-first.
+.
+The tricky part is the end of the sentence: "in spite of the Cloud".
+
+---
+## References
+.
+% FIXME: links
+1. "Local-First Software: You Own Your Data, in spite of the Cloud", by M. Kleppmann, A. Wiggins, P. Van Hardenberg and M. F. McGranaghan
+2. The Morning Paper article
+3. "A Note on Distributed Compiting", by J. Waldo, G. Wyant, A. Wollrath and S. Kendall
+4. these slides: euandre.org/slide/
+5. prose version of this presentation
+6. view source