diff options
Diffstat (limited to '')
6 files changed, 300 insertions, 9 deletions
diff --git a/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po b/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po index fe7205f..57ea9cb 100644 --- a/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po +++ b/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po @@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ msgstr "" msgid "" "The point is: if the software isn't free/libre, \"The Long Now\" isn't " "achievable without a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe the authors were trying " -"to be more friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in doing so " -"they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" with " -"proprietary software." +"to be more friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in " +"doing so they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" " +"with proprietary software." msgstr "" msgid "" diff --git a/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po b/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e285d50 --- /dev/null +++ b/locale/eo/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +# +msgid "" +msgstr "" + +msgid "title: POSIX sh and shebangs" +msgstr "" + +msgid "date: 2021-01-17" +msgstr "" + +msgid "layout: post" +msgstr "" + +msgid "lang: en" +msgstr "" + +msgid "ref: posix-sh-and-shebangs" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"As I [keep moving][posix-awk-0] [towards POSIX][posix-awk-1], I'm on the " +"process of migrating all my Bash scripts to POSIX sh." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"As I dropped `[[`, arrays and other Bashisms, I was left staring at the " +"first line of every script, wondering what to do: what is the POSIX sh " +"equivalent of `#!/usr/bin/env bash`? I already knew that POSIX says nothing " +"about shebangs, and that the portable way to call a POSIX sh script is `sh " +"script.sh`, but I didn't know what to do with that first line." +msgstr "" + +msgid "What I had previously was:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"#!/usr/bin/env bash\n" +"set -Eeuo pipefail\n" +"cd \"$(dirname \"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}\")\"\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Obviously, the `$BASH_SOURCE` would be gone, and I would have to adapt some " +"of my scripts to not rely on the script location. The `-E` and `-o pipefail`" +" options were also gone, and would be replaced by nothing." +msgstr "" + +msgid "I converted all of them to:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "#!/bin/sh -eu\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"I moved the `-eu` options to the shebang line itself, striving for " +"conciseness. But as I changed callers from `./script.sh` to `sh script.sh`, " +"things started to fail. Some tests that should fail reported errors, but " +"didn't return 1." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"My first reaction was to revert back to `./script.sh`, but the POSIX bug I " +"caught is a strong strain, and when I went back to it, I figured that the " +"callers were missing some flags. Specifically, `sh -eu script.sh`." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Then it clicked: when running with `sh script.sh`, the shebang line with the" +" sh options is ignored, as it is a comment!" +msgstr "" + +msgid "Which means that the shebang most friendly with POSIX is:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"#!/bin/sh\n" +"set -eu\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"when running via `./script.sh`, if the system has an executable at " +"`/bin/sh`, it will be used to run the script;" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"when running via `sh script.sh`, the sh options aren't ignored as " +"previously." +msgstr "" + +msgid "TIL." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"[posix-awk-0]: {% link _tils/2020-12-15-awk-snippet-shellcheck-all-scripts-" +"in-a-repository.md %} [posix-awk-1]: {% link _tils/2021-01-12-awk-snippet-" +"send-email-to-multiple-recipients-with-curl.md %}" +msgstr "" diff --git a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po index fe7205f..57ea9cb 100644 --- a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po +++ b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po @@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ msgstr "" msgid "" "The point is: if the software isn't free/libre, \"The Long Now\" isn't " "achievable without a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe the authors were trying " -"to be more friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in doing so " -"they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" with " -"proprietary software." +"to be more friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in " +"doing so they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" " +"with proprietary software." msgstr "" msgid "" diff --git a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e285d50 --- /dev/null +++ b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +# +msgid "" +msgstr "" + +msgid "title: POSIX sh and shebangs" +msgstr "" + +msgid "date: 2021-01-17" +msgstr "" + +msgid "layout: post" +msgstr "" + +msgid "lang: en" +msgstr "" + +msgid "ref: posix-sh-and-shebangs" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"As I [keep moving][posix-awk-0] [towards POSIX][posix-awk-1], I'm on the " +"process of migrating all my Bash scripts to POSIX sh." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"As I dropped `[[`, arrays and other Bashisms, I was left staring at the " +"first line of every script, wondering what to do: what is the POSIX sh " +"equivalent of `#!/usr/bin/env bash`? I already knew that POSIX says nothing " +"about shebangs, and that the portable way to call a POSIX sh script is `sh " +"script.sh`, but I didn't know what to do with that first line." +msgstr "" + +msgid "What I had previously was:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"#!/usr/bin/env bash\n" +"set -Eeuo pipefail\n" +"cd \"$(dirname \"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}\")\"\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Obviously, the `$BASH_SOURCE` would be gone, and I would have to adapt some " +"of my scripts to not rely on the script location. The `-E` and `-o pipefail`" +" options were also gone, and would be replaced by nothing." +msgstr "" + +msgid "I converted all of them to:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "#!/bin/sh -eu\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"I moved the `-eu` options to the shebang line itself, striving for " +"conciseness. But as I changed callers from `./script.sh` to `sh script.sh`, " +"things started to fail. Some tests that should fail reported errors, but " +"didn't return 1." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"My first reaction was to revert back to `./script.sh`, but the POSIX bug I " +"caught is a strong strain, and when I went back to it, I figured that the " +"callers were missing some flags. Specifically, `sh -eu script.sh`." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Then it clicked: when running with `sh script.sh`, the shebang line with the" +" sh options is ignored, as it is a comment!" +msgstr "" + +msgid "Which means that the shebang most friendly with POSIX is:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"#!/bin/sh\n" +"set -eu\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"when running via `./script.sh`, if the system has an executable at " +"`/bin/sh`, it will be used to run the script;" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"when running via `sh script.sh`, the sh options aren't ignored as " +"previously." +msgstr "" + +msgid "TIL." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"[posix-awk-0]: {% link _tils/2020-12-15-awk-snippet-shellcheck-all-scripts-" +"in-a-repository.md %} [posix-awk-1]: {% link _tils/2021-01-12-awk-snippet-" +"send-email-to-multiple-recipients-with-curl.md %}" +msgstr "" diff --git a/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po b/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po index fe7205f..57ea9cb 100644 --- a/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po +++ b/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.po @@ -132,9 +132,9 @@ msgstr "" msgid "" "The point is: if the software isn't free/libre, \"The Long Now\" isn't " "achievable without a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe the authors were trying " -"to be more friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in doing so " -"they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" with " -"proprietary software." +"to be more friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in " +"doing so they've proposed a contradiction by reconciling \"The Long Now\" " +"with proprietary software." msgstr "" msgid "" diff --git a/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po b/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e285d50 --- /dev/null +++ b/locale/pt/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-01-17-posix-sh-and-shebangs.po @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@ +# +msgid "" +msgstr "" + +msgid "title: POSIX sh and shebangs" +msgstr "" + +msgid "date: 2021-01-17" +msgstr "" + +msgid "layout: post" +msgstr "" + +msgid "lang: en" +msgstr "" + +msgid "ref: posix-sh-and-shebangs" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"As I [keep moving][posix-awk-0] [towards POSIX][posix-awk-1], I'm on the " +"process of migrating all my Bash scripts to POSIX sh." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"As I dropped `[[`, arrays and other Bashisms, I was left staring at the " +"first line of every script, wondering what to do: what is the POSIX sh " +"equivalent of `#!/usr/bin/env bash`? I already knew that POSIX says nothing " +"about shebangs, and that the portable way to call a POSIX sh script is `sh " +"script.sh`, but I didn't know what to do with that first line." +msgstr "" + +msgid "What I had previously was:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"#!/usr/bin/env bash\n" +"set -Eeuo pipefail\n" +"cd \"$(dirname \"${BASH_SOURCE[0]}\")\"\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Obviously, the `$BASH_SOURCE` would be gone, and I would have to adapt some " +"of my scripts to not rely on the script location. The `-E` and `-o pipefail`" +" options were also gone, and would be replaced by nothing." +msgstr "" + +msgid "I converted all of them to:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "#!/bin/sh -eu\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"I moved the `-eu` options to the shebang line itself, striving for " +"conciseness. But as I changed callers from `./script.sh` to `sh script.sh`, " +"things started to fail. Some tests that should fail reported errors, but " +"didn't return 1." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"My first reaction was to revert back to `./script.sh`, but the POSIX bug I " +"caught is a strong strain, and when I went back to it, I figured that the " +"callers were missing some flags. Specifically, `sh -eu script.sh`." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"Then it clicked: when running with `sh script.sh`, the shebang line with the" +" sh options is ignored, as it is a comment!" +msgstr "" + +msgid "Which means that the shebang most friendly with POSIX is:" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"#!/bin/sh\n" +"set -eu\n" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"when running via `./script.sh`, if the system has an executable at " +"`/bin/sh`, it will be used to run the script;" +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"when running via `sh script.sh`, the sh options aren't ignored as " +"previously." +msgstr "" + +msgid "TIL." +msgstr "" + +msgid "" +"[posix-awk-0]: {% link _tils/2020-12-15-awk-snippet-shellcheck-all-scripts-" +"in-a-repository.md %} [posix-awk-1]: {% link _tils/2021-01-12-awk-snippet-" +"send-email-to-multiple-recipients-with-curl.md %}" +msgstr "" |