aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/_posts/2018-08-01-verifying-npm-ci-reproducibility.md
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '_posts/2018-08-01-verifying-npm-ci-reproducibility.md')
-rw-r--r--_posts/2018-08-01-verifying-npm-ci-reproducibility.md153
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 153 deletions
diff --git a/_posts/2018-08-01-verifying-npm-ci-reproducibility.md b/_posts/2018-08-01-verifying-npm-ci-reproducibility.md
deleted file mode 100644
index efb5fea..0000000
--- a/_posts/2018-08-01-verifying-npm-ci-reproducibility.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,153 +0,0 @@
----
-title: Verifying "npm ci" reproducibility
-date: 2018-08-01
-layout: post
----
-When
-[npm\@5](https://blog.npmjs.org/post/161081169345/v500) came bringing
-[package-locks](https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package-locks) with it, I
-was confused about the benefits it provided, since running `npm install`
-more than once could resolve all the dependencies again and yield yet
-another fresh `package-lock.json` file. The message saying \"you should
-add this file to version control\" left me hesitant on what to do[^1].
-
-However the [addition of
-`npm ci`](https://blog.npmjs.org/post/171556855892/introducing-npm-ci-for-faster-more-reliable)
-filled this gap: it\'s a stricter variation of `npm install` which
-guarantees that \"[subsequent installs are able to generate identical
-trees](https://docs.npmjs.com/files/package-lock.json)\". But are they
-really identical? I could see that I didn\'t have the same problems of
-different installation outputs, but I didn\'t know for **sure** if it
-was really identical.
-
-Computing the hash of a directory\'s content
---------------------------------------------
-
-I quickly searched for a way to check for the hash signature of an
-entire directory tree, but I couldn\'t find one. I\'ve made a poor
-man\'s [Merkle tree](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Merkle_tree)
-implementation using `sha256sum` and a few piped commands at the
-terminal:
-
-``` {.bash .numberLines startFrom=""}
-merkle-tree () {
- dirname="${1-.}"
- pushd "$dirname"
- find . -type f | \
- sort | \
- xargs -I{} sha256sum "{}" | \
- sha256sum | \
- awk '{print $1}'
- popd
-}
-```
-
-Going through it line by line:
-
-- \#1 we define a Bash function called `merkle-tree`;
-- \#2 it accepts a single argument: the directory to compute the
- merkle tree from. If nothing is given, it runs on the current
- directory (`.`);
-- \#3 we go to the directory, so we don\'t get different prefixes in
- `find`\'s output (like `../a/b`);
-- \#4 we get all files from the directory tree. Since we\'re using
- `sha256sum` to compute the hash of the file contents, we need to
- filter out folders from it;
-- \#5 we need to sort the output, since different file systems and
- `find` implementations may return files in different orders;
-- \#6 we use `xargs` to compute the hash of each file individually
- through `sha256sum`. Since a file may contain spaces we need to
- escape it with quotes;
-- \#7 we compute the hash of the combined hashes. Since `sha256sum`
- output is formatted like `<hash> <filename>`, it produces a
- different final hash if a file ever changes name without changing
- it\'s content;
-- \#8 we get the final hash output, excluding the `<filename>` (which
- is `-` in this case, aka `stdin`).
-
-### Positive points:
-
-1. ignore timestamp: running more than once on different installation
- yields the same hash;
-2. the name of the file is included in the final hash computation.
-
-### Limitations:
-
-1. it ignores empty folders from the hash computation;
-2. the implementation\'s only goal is to represent using a digest
- whether the content of a given directory is the same or not. Leaf
- presence checking is obviously missing from it.
-
-### Testing locally with sample data
-
-``` {.bash .numberLines startFrom=""}
-mkdir /tmp/merkle-tree-test/
-cd /tmp/merkle-tree-test/
-mkdir -p a/b/ a/c/ d/
-echo "one" > a/b/one.txt
-echo "two" > a/c/two.txt
-echo "three" > d/three.txt
-merkle-tree . # output is be343bb01fe00aeb8fef14a3e16b1c3d1dccbf86d7e41b4753e6ccb7dc3a57c3
-merkle-tree . # output still is be343bb01fe00aeb8fef14a3e16b1c3d1dccbf86d7e41b4753e6ccb7dc3a57c3
-echo "four" > d/four.txt
-merkle-tree . # output is now b5464b958969ed81815641ace96b33f7fd52c20db71a7fccc45a36b3a2ae4d4c
-rm d/four.txt
-merkle-tree . # output back to be343bb01fe00aeb8fef14a3e16b1c3d1dccbf86d7e41b4753e6ccb7dc3a57c3
-echo "hidden-five" > a/b/one.txt
-merkle-tree . # output changed 471fae0d074947e4955e9ac53e95b56e4bc08d263d89d82003fb58a0ffba66f5
-```
-
-It seems to work for this simple test case.
-
-You can try copying and pasting it to verify the hash signatures.
-
-Using `merkle-tree` to check the output of `npm ci`
----------------------------------------------------
-
-*I\'ve done all of the following using Node.js v8.11.3 and npm\@6.1.0.*
-
-In this test case I\'ll take the main repo of
-[Lerna](https://lernajs.io/)[^2]:
-
-``` {.bash .numberLines startFrom=""}
-cd /tmp/
-git clone https://github.com/lerna/lerna.git
-cd lerna/
-git checkout 57ff865c0839df75dbe1974971d7310f235e1109
-npm ci
-merkle-tree node_modules/ # outputs 11e218c4ac32fac8a9607a8da644fe870a25c99821167d21b607af45699afafa
-rm -rf node_modules/
-npm ci
-merkle-tree node_modules/ # outputs 11e218c4ac32fac8a9607a8da644fe870a25c99821167d21b607af45699afafa
-npm ci # test if it also works with an existing node_modules/ folder
-merkle-tree node_modules/ # outputs 11e218c4ac32fac8a9607a8da644fe870a25c99821167d21b607af45699afafa
-```
-
-Good job `npm ci` :)
-
-\#6 and \#9 take some time to run (21 seconds in my machine), but this
-specific use case isn\'t performance sensitive. The slowest step is
-computing the hash of each individual file.
-
-Conclusion
-----------
-
-`npm ci` really \"generates identical trees\".
-
-I\'m not aware of any other existing solution for verifying the hash
-signature of a directory. If you know any I\'d [like to
-know](mailto:eu@euandre.org).
-
-*Edit*
-------
-
-2019/05/22: Fix spelling.
-
-[^1]: The
- [documentation](https://docs.npmjs.com/cli/install#description)
- claims `npm install` is driven by the existing `package-lock.json`,
- but that\' actually [a little bit
- tricky](https://github.com/npm/npm/issues/17979#issuecomment-332701215).
-
-[^2]: Finding a big known repo that actually committed the
- `package-lock.json` file was harder than I expected.