aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/_articles
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to '')
-rw-r--r--_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md2
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md b/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md
index 1a41c0c..635a9a5 100644
--- a/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md
+++ b/_articles/2020-11-14-local-first-software-you-own-your-data-in-spite-of-the-cloud-article-review.md
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ rather a "Long Now as long as the software keeps working as expected".
The point is: if the software isn't free/libre, "The Long Now" isn't achievable
without a lot of wishful thinking. Maybe the authors were trying to be more
-friendly towards business who don't like FOSS, but in doing so they've proposed
+friendly towards business who don't like libre software, but in doing so they've proposed
a contradiction by reconciling "The Long Now" with proprietary software.
It isn't the same as saying that any free/libre software achieves that ideal,