rm -rf v2/

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 204 deletions

diff --git a/v2/src/content/en/slide/local-first.slides b/v2/src/content/en/slide/local-first.slides
deleted file mode 100644
index fd83115..0000000
--- a/v2/src/content/en/slide/local-first.slides
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,204 +0,0 @@
-# On "local-first"
-
-@Beyond the CRDT silver bullet
-
----
-## Part 1
-# Exposition
-
----
-## Target
-...
-- documents
-- files
-- personal data repositories
-..
-Not: banking services, e-commerce, social networking, ride-sharing, etc.
-
----
-...
-# 7 ideals for local-first software
-
----
-...
-# 1 - no spinners: your work at your fingertips
-
----
-...
-# 2 - your work is not trapped on one device
-
----
-...
-# 3 - the network is optional
-
----
-...
-# 4 - seamless collaboration with your colleagues
-
----
-...
-# 5 - the long now
-
----
-...
-# 6 - security and privacy by default 
-
----
-...
-# 7 - you retain ultimate ownership and control
-
----
-## Towards a better future
-....
-@ CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types) as a Foundational Technology
-
----
-## Use case
-.
-	# in node A and node B
-	s = "Hello, World"
-	
-	# in node A
-	s = "Hello, Alice"
-	
-	# in node B
-	s = "Hello, Bob"
-
-How to reconcile those?
-- Hello, ABloibce
-- Hello, AliceBob
-- Hello, BobAlice
-- Hello, Alice
-\...
-
----
-# Existing CRDTs differ
-- performance
-- storage
-- compression
-- metadata overhead
-
----
-...
-# Hint towards the "automerge" CRDT
-
----
-......
-@@show comparison table, page 9
-
----
-## Part 2
-# Critique
-
----
-## Software license
-...
-@@"In our opinion, maintaining control and ownership of data does not mean that the software must necessarily be open source."
-
----
-## Example 1 - intentional restriction
-.
-	#!/bin/sh
-	TODAY="$(date +%s)"
-	LICENSE_EXPIRATION="$(date -d 2020-10-27 +%s)"
-	if [ "$TODAY" -ge "$LICENSE_EXPIRATION" ]; then
-		echo 'License expired!'
-		exit 1
-	fi
-	echo $((2 + 2))
-.
-	# today
-	$ ./useful-adder.sh
-	4
-
-	# tomorrow
-	$ ./useful-adder.sh
-	License expired!
----
-## Example 2 - unintentional restriction
-.
-	# today
-	$ useful-program
-	# ... useful output ...
-	
-	# tomorrow, with more data
-	$ useful-program
-	ERROR: Panic!  Stack overflow!
-
----
-..
-# local-first *requires* free software 
-
-Otherwise "The Long Now" (ideal nº5) is lost
-
----
-## Denial of existing solutions
-..
-@@"In principle it is possible to collaborate without a repository service, e.g. by sending patch files by email, but the majority of Git users rely on GitHub." 
-.
-Solution: either GitHub+CRDTs or git send-email 
-
----
-## Plain-text formats
-.
-@@"Git is highly optimized for code and similar line-based text file"
-.
-It even pulls software to the plain text directtion, e.g.:
-- delivery-templates
-- common-core.protocols.config
-.
-Why not exploit that more?
-
----
-## Ditching of web applications
-..
-@@"The architecture of web apps remains fundamentally server-centric
-.
-% FIXME: links
-Disagree.  Contrast PouchDB with Android Instant Apps
-
----
-## Costs are underrated
-.
-- storage
-- backups
-- maintenance
-.
-Example: blog vs vlog
-
----
-## Real-time collaboration a bit overrated
-.
-It is only possible on the presence of reliable, medium-quality network connection
-..
-@@"X also works when inside an elevator, subway or plane!"
-
----
-## On CRDTs and developer experience
-.
-@@"For an app developer, how does the use of a CRDT-based data layer compare to existing storage layers like a SQL database, a filesystem, or CoreData?  Is a distributed system harder to write software for?
-.
-@YES.
-.
-% FIXME: link
-See "A Note on Distributed Computing"
-
----
-## Conclusion
-.
-Why this is a "paper I love": it took offline-first and ran with it.
-.
-But a pinch of CRDT won't make the world local-first. 
-.
-The tricky part is the end of the sentence: "in spite of the Cloud".
-
----
-## References
-.
-% FIXME: links
-1. "Local-First Software: You Own Your Data, in spite of the Cloud", by M. Kleppmann, A. Wiggins, P. Van Hardenberg and M. F. McGranaghan
-2. The Morning Paper article
-3. "A Note on Distributed Compiting", by J. Waldo, G. Wyant, A. Wollrath and S. Kendall
-4. these slides: euandre.org/slide/
-5. prose version of this presentation
-6. view source