Add po files for new TILs, update whitespace of others

3 files changed, 315 insertions, 3 deletions

diff --git a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2020-09-05-pull-requests-with-git-the-old-school-way.po b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2020-09-05-pull-requests-with-git-the-old-school-way.po
index 182061b..1610cea 100644
--- a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2020-09-05-pull-requests-with-git-the-old-school-way.po
+++ b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2020-09-05-pull-requests-with-git-the-old-school-way.po
@@ -25,9 +25,9 @@ msgid ""
 "The only difference is that you're working with only Git itself, so you're "
 "not tied to any Git hosting provider: you can send pull requests across them"
 " transparently! You could even use your own "
-"[cgit](https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/) installation. No need to be locked"
-" in by any of them, putting the \"D\" back in \"DVCS\": it's a "
-"**distributed** version control system."
+"[cgit](https://git.zx2c4.com/cgit/) installation. No need to be locked in by"
+" any of them, putting the \"D\" back in \"DVCS\": it's a **distributed** "
+"version control system."
 msgstr ""
 
 msgid "`git request-pull` introduction"
diff --git a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-clojure-auto-curry.po b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-clojure-auto-curry.po
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..67ff1b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-clojure-auto-curry.po
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+#
+msgid ""
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "title: Clojure auto curry"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "date: 2021-04-24"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "layout: post"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "lang: en"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "ref: clojure-auto-curry"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"A simple macro defined by [Loretta "
+"He](http://lorettahe.github.io/clojure/2016/09/22/clojure-auto-curry) to "
+"create Clojure functions that are curried on all arguments, relying on "
+"Clojure's multi-arity support:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"(defmacro defcurry\n"
+"  [fname args & body]\n"
+"  (let [partials (map (fn [n]\n"
+"                        `(~(subvec args 0 n) (partial ~fname ~@(take n args))))\n"
+"                      (range 1 (count args)))]\n"
+"    `(defn ~fname\n"
+"       (~args ~@body)\n"
+"       ~@partials)))\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "A naive `add` definition, alongside its usage and macroexpansion:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"user=> (defcurry add\n"
+"         [a b c d e]\n"
+"         (+ 1 2 3 4 5))\n"
+"#'user/add\n"
+"\n"
+"user=> (add 1)\n"
+"#object[clojure.core$partial$fn__5857 0x2c708440 \"clojure.core$partial$fn__5857@2c708440\"]\n"
+"\n"
+"user=> (add 1 2 3 4)\n"
+"#object[clojure.core$partial$fn__5863 0xf4c0e4e \"clojure.core$partial$fn__5863@f4c0e4e\"]\n"
+"\n"
+"user=> ((add 1) 2 3 4 5)\n"
+"15\n"
+"\n"
+"user=> (((add 1) 2 3) 4 5)\n"
+"15\n"
+"\n"
+"user=> (use 'clojure.pprint)\n"
+"nil\n"
+"\n"
+"user=> (pprint\n"
+"        (macroexpand\n"
+"         '(defcurry add\n"
+"            [a b c d e]\n"
+"            (+ 1 2 3 4 5))))\n"
+"(def\n"
+" add\n"
+" (clojure.core/fn\n"
+"  ([a b c d e] (+ 1 2 3 4 5))\n"
+"  ([a] (clojure.core/partial add a))\n"
+"  ([a b] (clojure.core/partial add a b))\n"
+"  ([a b c] (clojure.core/partial add a b c))\n"
+"  ([a b c d] (clojure.core/partial add a b c d))))\n"
+"nil\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"This simplistic `defcurry` definition doesn't support optional parameters, "
+"multi-arity, `&` rest arguments, docstrings, etc., but it could certainly "
+"evolve to do so."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"I like how `defcurry` is so short, and abdicates the responsability of doing"
+" the multi-arity logic to Clojure's built-in multi-arity support. Simple and"
+" elegant."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "Same Clojure as before, now with auto-currying via macros."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "Comparison with Common Lisp"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "My attempt at writing an equivalent for Common Lisp gives me:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"(defun curry-n (n fn)\n"
+"  (if (= 0 n)\n"
+"            (funcall fn)\n"
+"            (lambda (&rest rest)\n"
+"                (curry-n (something n) fn))))\n"
+"\n"
+"(defun add (a b c d e)\n"
+"  (curry-n\n"
+"     (length '(a b c d e))\n"
+"     (lambda (&rest rest)\n"
+"         (apply #'+ rest))))\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Without built-in multi-arity support, we have to do more work, like tracking"
+" the number of arguments consumed so far. That is, without dependending on "
+"any library, sticking to ANSI Common Lisp."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"This also require `funcall`s, since we return a `lambda` that doesn't live "
+"in the function namespace."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Like the Clojure one, it doesn't support optional parameters, `&rest` rest "
+"arguments, docstrings, etc., but it also could evolve to do so."
+msgstr ""
diff --git a/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.po b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.po
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b773879
--- /dev/null
+++ b/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/_tils/2021-04-24-common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-function.po
@@ -0,0 +1,185 @@
+#
+msgid ""
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"title: Common Lisp argument precedence order parameterization of a generic "
+"function"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "date: 2021-04-24"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "layout: post"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "lang: en"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"ref: common-lisp-argument-precedence-order-parameterization-of-a-generic-"
+"function"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"When CLOS dispatches a method, it picks the most specific method definition "
+"to the argument list:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"\n"
+"* (defgeneric a-fn (x))\n"
+"#<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION A-FN (0) {5815ACB9}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod a-fn (x) :default-method)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD A-FN (T) {581DB535}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod a-fn ((x number)) :a-number)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD A-FN (NUMBER) {58241645}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod a-fn ((x (eql 1))) :number-1)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD A-FN ((EQL 1)) {582A7D75}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (a-fn nil)\n"
+":DEFAULT-METHOD\n"
+"\n"
+"* (a-fn \"1\")\n"
+":DEFAULT-METHOD\n"
+"\n"
+"* (a-fn 0)\n"
+":A-NUMBER\n"
+"\n"
+"* (a-fn 1)\n"
+":NUMBER-1\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"CLOS uses a similar logic when choosing the method from parent classes, when"
+" multiple ones are available:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"* (defclass class-a () ())\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS-A {583E0B25}>\n"
+"* (defclass class-b () ())\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS-B {583E7F6D}>\n"
+"* (defgeneric another-fn (obj))\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION ANOTHER-FN (0) {583DA749}>\n"
+"* (defmethod another-fn ((obj class-a)) :class-a)\n"
+"; Compiling LAMBDA (.PV-CELL. .NEXT-METHOD-CALL. OBJ):\n"
+"; Compiling Top-Level Form:\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD ANOTHER-FN (CLASS-A) {584523C5}>\n"
+"* (defmethod another-fn ((obj class-b)) :class-b)\n"
+"; Compiling LAMBDA (.PV-CELL. .NEXT-METHOD-CALL. OBJ):\n"
+"; Compiling Top-Level Form:\n"
+"\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD ANOTHER-FN (CLASS-B) {584B8895}>\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Given the above definitions, when inheriting from `class-a` and `class-b`, "
+"the order of inheritance matters:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"* (defclass class-a-coming-first (class-a class-b) ())\n"
+"#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS-A-COMING-FIRST {584BE6AD}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defclass class-b-coming-first (class-b class-a) ())\n"
+"#<STANDARD-CLASS CLASS-B-COMING-FIRST {584C744D}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (another-fn (make-instance 'class-a-coming-first))\n"
+":CLASS-A\n"
+"\n"
+"* (another-fn (make-instance 'class-b-coming-first))\n"
+":CLASS-B\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Combining the order of inheritance with generic functions with multiple "
+"arguments, CLOS has to make a choice of how to pick a method given two "
+"competing definitions, and its default strategy is prioritizing from left to"
+" right:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"* (defgeneric yet-another-fn (obj1 obj2))\n"
+"#<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION YET-ANOTHER-FN (0) {584D9EC9}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod yet-another-fn ((obj1 class-a) obj2) :first-arg-specialized)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD YET-ANOTHER-FN (CLASS-A T) {5854269D}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (defmethod yet-another-fn (obj1 (obj2 class-b)) :second-arg-specialized)\n"
+"#<STANDARD-METHOD YET-ANOTHER-FN (T CLASS-B) {585AAAAD}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (yet-another-fn (make-instance 'class-a) (make-instance 'class-b))\n"
+":FIRST-ARG-SPECIALIZED\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"CLOS has to make a choice between the first and the second definition of "
+"`yet-another-fn`, but its choice is just a heuristic. What if we want to the"
+" choice to be based on the second argument first?"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"For that, we use the `:argument-precedence-order` option when declaring a "
+"generic function:"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"* (defgeneric yet-another-fn (obj1 obj2) (:argument-precedence-order obj2 obj1))\n"
+"#<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION YET-ANOTHER-FN (2) {584D9EC9}>\n"
+"\n"
+"* (yet-another-fn (make-instance 'class-a) (make-instance 'class-b))\n"
+":SECOND-ARG-SPECIALIZED\n"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"I liked that the `:argument-precedence-order` option exists. We shouldn't "
+"have to change the arguments from `(obj1 obj2)` to `(obj2 obj1)` just to "
+"make CLOS pick the method that we want. We can configure its default "
+"behaviour if desired, and keep the order of arguments however it best fits "
+"the generic function."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "Comparison with Clojure"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "Clojure has an equivalent, when using `defmulti`."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Since when declaring a multi-method with `defmulti` we must define the "
+"dispatch function, Clojure uses it to pick the method definition. Since the "
+"dispatch function is required, there is no need for a default behaviour, "
+"such as left-to-right."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "Conclusion"
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"Making the argument precedence order configurable for generic functions but "
+"not for class definitions makes a lot of sense."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"When declaring a class, we can choose the precedence order, and that is "
+"about it. But when defining a generic function, the order of argumentws is "
+"more important to the function semantics, and the argument precedence being "
+"left-to-right is just the default behaviour."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid ""
+"One shouldn't change the order of arguments of a generic function for the "
+"sake of tailoring it to the CLOS priority ranking algorithm, but doing it "
+"for a class definition is just fine."
+msgstr ""
+
+msgid "TIL."
+msgstr ""